178. (31376-!-item-!-188;#058&005785)

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protectingrequiring修饰laws吗 可否用to require来修饰？
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
选B

 

这个我简单说两句你就明白了
如果你直接问我应该用requiring还是to require来修饰law
我只能告诉你都可以
我们讨论的时候说过很多次，这种定语的修饰在很多时候不是像早先白大虾写得那么严格。
但是在这种情况下到底使用to require好呢 还是requiring好呢？

那我就要问你一个问题了，这个law的目的就是要去require device么？
不是吧
require device不过是这个law达到目的的办法，
所以这里用requiring就比用to require要好

希望这样的解释能够帮助你
来自：http://www.beyondgmat.com/index.php/bbs?func=view&catid=5&id=825